How frequently should EMS protocols be reviewed for relevance and accuracy?

Reviewing EMS protocols annually or as needed ensures that they remain current and relevant in the fast-evolving field of emergency medical services. Regular annual reviews allow for integration of the latest clinical guidelines, technology advances, legal aspects, and best practices. This timeframe is also suitable for assessing any changes in local, state, or national regulations that may impact protocols.

Additionally, the phrase "as needed" acknowledges that sometimes urgent updates are required, such as after new research suggests changes to care methods or following critical incidents that point to necessary protocol adjustments. This flexibility helps maintain a high standard of care in emergency situations.

The other options do not provide the same level of responsiveness to the dynamic nature of emergency medical services. For instance, reviewing protocols every five years may not address immediate updates needed from advancements or operational experiences that arise within that period. Relying solely on major incidents to trigger reviews can lead to outdated practices persisting until problems arise. Frequent monthly reviews, on the other hand, could lead to unnecessary changes and confusion among EMS personnel, as constant adjustments might hinder consistency in patient care.